Graphic Lp Optimizer

Example (part 2): Graphical method

  1. Graphic Lp Optimizer Software
  2. Graphic Lp Optimizer Free

Solve using the Graphical method the following problem:

MaximizeZ = f(x,y) = 3x + 2y
subject to:2x + y ≤ 18
2x + 3y ≤ 42
3x + y ≤ 24
x ≥ 0 , y ≥ 0
  • Graphic Lp Optimizer. Posted on 5/27/2018 by admin. Corel Corporation. Our best just got betterMAGIX Red uw lps 2016. De combinatie uit voorversterker en software biedt u ontelbaar vele mogelijkheden om het geluid van uw lps cassettes na het opnemen te.
  • This video shows how to solve the following linear programming problem (involving multiple/alternative solutions) using graphical method.This chan.
  1. Initially the coordinate system is drawn and each variable is associated to an axis (generally 'x' is associated to the horizontal axis and 'y' to the vertical one), as shown in figure 1.
  2. A numerical scale is marked in axis, appropriate to the values that variables can take according to the problem constraints. In order to do this, for each variable corresponding to an axis, all variables are set to zero except the variable associated to the studied axis in each constraint.
  3. The following step is to represent the restrictions. Beginning with the first, the line obtained by considering the constraint as an equality is drawn. In the example, this line is the segment connecting A and B points, and the region delimiting this restriction is indicated by the color YELLOW. This process is repeated with the other restrictions, BLUE and RED regions correspond to the second and third constraint respectively.
  4. The feasible region is the intersection of the regions defined by the set of constraints and the coordinate axis (conditions of non-negativity of variables). This feasible region is represented by the O-F-H-G-C polygon in PURPLE color.
  5. As a feasible region exists, extreme values (or polygon vertices) are calculated. These vertices are the points candidate as optimal solutions. In the example, these points are O, F, H, G, and C, as shown in the figure.
  6. Finally, the objective function (3x + 2y) is evaluated in each of these points (results are shown in the tableau below). Since G-point provides the greatest value to the Z-function and the objective is to maximize, this point is the optimal solution: Z = 33 with x = 3 and y = 12.
OptimizerGraphic Lp Optimizer

The linear programming relaxation of an integer program may be solved using any standard linear programming technique. If the optimal solution to the linear program happens to have all variables either 0 or 1, it will also be an optimal solution to the original integer program. AB InBev Chooses Gurobi to Optimize its Global, End-to-End Supply Chain Planning Gurobi Optimization, LLC today announced that Anheuser-Busch InBev (AB InBev), the world’s largest brewer, has selected the Gurobi Optimizer as the mathematical optimization solver that will power its new global. Optimizer is a program which helps you to make your graphic files as small as possible, and control the level of distortion the compression made to them. It takes pnm, png or jpeg filesand produces jpg, jp2 and djvu files (using netpbm, jasper, djvulibr.

Extreme pointCoordinates (x,y)Objective value (Z)
O(0,0)0
C(0,14)28
G(3,12)33
H(6,6)30
F(8,0)24

Graphical method and Simplex method comparison

Successive constructed tableaux in the Simplex method will provide the value of the objective function at the vertices of the feasible region, adjusting simultaneously, the coefficients of initial and slack variables.

In the initial tableau the value of the objective function at the O-vertex is calculated, the coordinates (0,0) correspond to the value which have the basic variables, being the result 0.

Tableau I . 1st iteration.
32000
BaseCbP0P1P2P3P4P5
P301821100
P404223010
P502431001
Z0-3-2000

The input base variable in the Simplex method determines towards what new vertex is performed the displacement. In this example, as P1 (corresponding to 'x') enters, the displacement is carried out by the OF-edge to reach the F-vertex, where the Z-function value is calculated. This step occurs in the second iteration of the Simplex method, as shown in tableau II. The corresponding value to F-vertex is calculated in it, and Z = 24 is the obtained value for the function.

Tableau II . 2nd iteration.
32000
BaseCbP0P1P2P3P4P5
P30201/310-2/3
P402607/301-2/3
P13811/3001/3
Z240-1001

A new displacement by the FH-edge is made, up to H-vertex (data in Table III). In the third iteration, the value of the function at the H-vertex is calculated to obtain Z = 30.

Tableau III . 3rd iteration.
32000
BaseCbP0P1P2P3P4P5
P2260130-2
P401200-714
P13610-101
Z300030-1

The process goes on through the HG-edge up to G-vertex, obtained data are shown in tableau IV. At this point, the process ends, being able to check that the solution does not improve moving along GC-edge up to C-vertex (the current value of the Z-function is not increased).

Graphic Lp Optimizer Software

Tableau IV . 4th iteration.
32000
BaseCbP0P1P2P3P4P5
P221201-1/21/20
P50300-7/41/41
P133103/4-1/40
Z33005/41/40

Graphic Lp Optimizer Free

The maximum value of the objective function is 33, and it corresponds to the values x = 3 and y = 12 (G-vertex coordinates).

In Graphical method is necessary to calculate the value of the objective function at each vertex of feasible region, while the Simplex method ends when the optimum value is found.

Solve with PHPSimplex: Simplex method.

Solve with PHPSimplex: Graphical method.